Legal and Insurance Issues Rental agreements, lawsuits, lien sales, abandonment ... anything relating to legal issues for self-storage. Also discuss specialized insurance coverages for the business, stories of insurance claims, etc.

Reply
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 19th August 2010, 05:19 PM
ams's Avatar
ams ams is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockton, Ca.
Posts: 601
Default Cook v. Public Storage

Everyone should take a look at this. This effects others besides Wisconsin.

There are so many things that we did as normal procedure that has been put on it's head by the Appeals Court. Like change of address, inventory prior to sale, description of goods and authorized access, to name a few (the lawsuit was brought by someone who wasn't the tenant).

Tom Litton referenced this case a lot during his webinar, and when I downloaded the case, it made me nauseous.

This is not fun reading, but it is very very important reading for all.

If my employee says one more time, "well it is her or his stuff in the unit" I will terminate our employee-employer relationship

--
Ron
__________________
--
Ron

http://storagelienlaws.com
http://advancedministorage.com
http://findingstorage.com
email ron at storagelienlaws.com
Reply With Quote

  #2 (permalink)  
Old 19th August 2010, 05:32 PM
ams's Avatar
ams ams is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockton, Ca.
Posts: 601
Default Re: Cook v. Public Storage

Sorry forgot the link

http://www.wisbar.org/res/capp/2008/2007ap002077.htm


--
Ron
__________________
--
Ron

http://storagelienlaws.com
http://advancedministorage.com
http://findingstorage.com
email ron at storagelienlaws.com
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 19th August 2010, 06:25 PM
Autodoc's Avatar
Mod eMeritus
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Jamestown, ND
Posts: 2,820
Default Re: Cook v. Public Storage

Once again PS puts their worst foot forward

They did so many things wrong in this case it's surprising the Cooks don't own that facility!

Once again - following the lien laws will usually keep you safe.

Thanks for bringing this one up again -- keeps us all thinking.
__________________
Wayne
Jamestown, ND


All arguments can be resolved ... with high explosives and Humor!!!
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 19th August 2010, 06:30 PM
LauraGVAZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sahuarita AZ
Posts: 112
Default Re: Cook v. Public Storage

I read almost all of it, this case was brought on in 2008, some of the issues have changed, I do not think the plaintiff should have been awarded all that money BUT I would have handled all a little different, as a courtesy even if a customer has not filled out an actual "legal" address change, and this unit is in lien I will send a letter to that address also, and these people had only not paid one month, I think I would have contacted the second contact on the contract, you just have to be very careful as I did read about this case in ISS Magazine when it was unfolding and after that I have always remembered what could happen if you dont follow that law, and hey why not just go a little further, of course we would rather have that unit paid up by the customer than lose money with auctioning the unit! Okay I am ready bring it on.... I am sure this will bring alot of different views.....
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 19th August 2010, 06:31 PM
LauraGVAZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sahuarita AZ
Posts: 112
Default Re: Cook v. Public Storage

yes and this is why I dont and will not work for Public Storage, I have a sister in law that does in Colorado, they are not a good company to work for either....
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 19th August 2010, 06:45 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 102
Default Re: Cook v. Public Storage

Even though i'm in Canada, I took the time to read about this out of curiosity. I belive the settlements are out to lunch but how does a facility auction the wrong unit? I've heard this before on here and still can't come to grips with it. That has to be an example of the poorest kind of management that I have ever heard of and they deserved to be sued.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 19th August 2010, 06:53 PM
ams's Avatar
ams ams is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockton, Ca.
Posts: 601
Default Re: Cook v. Public Storage

Much of it seems to be a blunder on PS, however some of the published opinions are disturbing.

Many facilities utilize Access Cards or an Access Option on their agreements, which the tenant grants rights to another person. Many of these Access Cards state that the person on the card has the right to get the access code from the facility etc. The judges state by allowing access to the premises it is safe to surmise the authorized party is being allowed to store their own property.

The judges also state that for a commercially reasonable sale, it is the facility's duty to obtain the best price for a unit. Which can not be done if we don't know what is in the boxes or behind the soiled mattress.

I know this case is from 2008 however if the Published Opinion has many targets on facilities and how we operate today.
__________________
--
Ron

http://storagelienlaws.com
http://advancedministorage.com
http://findingstorage.com
email ron at storagelienlaws.com
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 19th August 2010, 06:59 PM
LauraGVAZ's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Sahuarita AZ
Posts: 112
Default Re: Cook v. Public Storage

In Mr. Ltton's last seminar that I attended he said that they actually look thru the items and place the more expensive items in the front so that they may get more money for items, my company does not touch anything, but I guess laws have changed and you may do that now... If your company agrees with this arrangement. Again I do not think they should have been awarded that much money but Public Storage did make many mistakes,
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 19th August 2010, 07:01 PM
ams's Avatar
ams ams is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Stockton, Ca.
Posts: 601
Default Re: Cook v. Public Storage

Quote:
Originally Posted by LauraGVAZ View Post
In Mr. Ltton's last seminar that I attended he said that they actually look thru the items and place the more expensive items in the front so that they may get more money for items, my company does not touch anything, but I guess laws have changed and you may do that now... If your company agrees with this arrangement. Again I do not think they should have been awarded that much money but Public Storage did make many mistakes,
No kidding on the award.......maybe I can go rent a unit
__________________
--
Ron

http://storagelienlaws.com
http://advancedministorage.com
http://findingstorage.com
email ron at storagelienlaws.com
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 19th August 2010, 08:24 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 102
Default Re: Cook v. Public Storage

From the linked article

"3. Public Storage failed to conduct the auction in a commercially reasonable manner and a commercially reasonable sale would have generated $5,000."

What the heck does mean? How can a court or jury determine how much revenue a auction should generate? Don't know about everyone on here but I have never had a unit auction for anywhere near $5000. $2000 max.
Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Self-Storage Training

Get industry education and certification through the Self-Storage Training Institute (SSTI), offered by Inside Self-Storage and Self-Storage Talk.
  • Available 24/7 online
  • Immediate results
  • Certification program
  • Single classes
  • Top-notch education
Click here now!

Forum Statistics

  • Forum Members: 5,160
  • Total Threads: 6,063
  • Total Posts: 54,533
There are 408 users currently browsing forums.