Results 1 to 10 of 35
Thread: SEO Vs. SEM
-
15th July 2010, 09:30 AM #1
SEO Vs. SEM
Which of these have you found to be more effective in bringing in customers?
SEO (search engine optimization) is, of course, "free" -- You have to pay someone to do the work, research and writing, but you don't have to pay for the listings. The goal is to get Web users to click from a search engine to your website in a completely organic way.
SEM (search engine marketing) is not free as you pay for certain search terms. But because you pay for positioning, you're guaranteeing that your ad or content will be seen.
So which is better for you?
-
15th July 2010, 12:35 PM #2
Re: SEO Vs. SEM
I have been trying out SEM for about 2 months. It has been more of a learning experience than anything. We have had 2 responses so far

I don't think you replace your SEO with SEM, you add the SEM. 2 or 3 listings on the search engine is better than 1.
Search engine choice for the SEM is important, you do not want to waste money on no results. I paused the Bing SEM and have kept Google and Yahoo for the time being.
--
Ron
Advanced Mini Storage--
Ron
http://storagelienlaws.com
http://advancedministorage.com
http://findingstorage.com
email ron at storagelienlaws.com
-
15th July 2010, 06:00 PM #3
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Raleigh NC
- Posts
- 252
Re: SEO Vs. SEM
We started with SEM and have migrated to SEO very well in one case, not so well in another. SEO seems to work better and they do work together. The biggest issue with SEO is good position in google's local business results which is hard for a big city.
-
15th July 2010, 06:19 PM #4
Senior Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Location
- Raleigh NC
- Posts
- 252
Re: SEO Vs. SEM
-
15th July 2010, 06:36 PM #5
Re: SEO Vs. SEM
Last edited by ams; 15th July 2010 at 06:45 PM.
--
Ron
http://storagelienlaws.com
http://advancedministorage.com
http://findingstorage.com
email ron at storagelienlaws.com
-
27th July 2010, 03:35 PM #6
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Posts
- 5
Re: SEO Vs. SEM
I would not look at as a SEO Vs. SEM issue. They both have their places and people have different viewpoints on which works better in which situations. However, from the experience that we've run across is that both will be able to provide you with visitors and potential leads.
I will tell you that statistics show that only a small portion of users searching click on the sponsored ads that Google shows while many more users look at the click through to the organic traffic listings. And here is another issue, the majority of users won't click through to a 2nd or 3rd page on their search query.
Peten has a good point about the local business results which I would not classify with SEO as it is a different animal. I wouldn't be too worried about ranking for a city, however. Google can detect the location of a search in most cases by their ip address. So for example :
If someone does a search query for "self storage" without the city name involved, Google will look up their ip address and determine their location and give a set of local listings that are most relevant to the searcher's ip address. There are definitely some things to ensure that your local listing gets maximum exposure, but Google is still molding and evolving their local algorithm (to prevent people from abusing their system).
I think advertising with the search engines is a really good way to start off because you only pay for the clicks that you receive. If you have the time I would focus on building a page strictly for conversion and test it with your ads.
If you have some analytics tool setup on your site you can track and see what users do after they come in through your advertisement and tweak your pages based on the data that comes in.
CheersSteven Lam
<a href="http://www.storagefront.com">StorageFront.com</a>
-
27th July 2010, 04:47 PM #7
Re: SEO Vs. SEM
I like SEO first and SEM second.
If SEO is keeping me where I want to be then I start to pull back/out of SEM
-
28th July 2010, 10:08 AM #8
Re: SEO Vs. SEM
When you're searching on ANY topic, how often would you say you click on the paid (or sponsored) links?
Being completely honest, I'd say 10 percent of the time tops.
-
28th July 2010, 10:19 AM #9
Re: SEO Vs. SEM
Almost never even when I see a link I want and then I type it into my address bar.
However, I do click my most favourite COMPETITORS sponsored ads every once and awhile as I seem to get some really sick and evil satisfaction from it ... sorry ... I'm not perfect ...
MUHAHA!
-
28th July 2010, 04:19 PM #10
Junior Member
- Join Date
- Nov 2009
- Posts
- 5
Re: SEO Vs. SEM
That is a good point. I saw some data that showed it being around 11-12%. That being said, most of the time I ignore the sponsored ads. I still think there is benefit in it. If the bids for a click are reasonable, it is a good place to get someone in with a more targeted message to them.
Steven Lam
<a href="http://www.storagefront.com">StorageFront.com</a>


LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote

Hi We are about half way through our first...
Seasonality in Self Storage