Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Credit Card Chargeback for unit break in?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Credit Card Chargeback for unit break in?

    This is kind of a long story....

    Customer rents 10x20 unit in September of 2017. She does pay rent every month until the first week of May in 2018 when she actually goes to her storage space. She comes in the office and says that's not her lock on the unit. The owner goes back with her and cuts the lock off, large pieces of antique furniture are missing from the unit according to the customer. We have no idea when the lock would have been replaced as the customer has not visited her space since January.

    We check that all units are locked at the beginning and end of every day and the owner drives through in the evenings and days the offices are closed.

    The customer is understandably upset and wants the owner to pay for the items she is missing. We are sympathetic to the situation, but we don't know what happened and we don't know when it happened and that's why we strongly recommend insuring the contents because, as all self storage operators, we are not responsible for anything that happens to the contents. The owner explains that we aren't responsible for the contents. She screams at us (literally) about attorneys and suing us. We decide that arguing with the customer is not helping and ask her to contact us at our office address in writing with any legal proceedings.

    We have since enhanced security procedures after being alerted to the problem that will help in the future.

    Customer moves out of the unit at the end of May, she shows accessing the gate on a regular basis throughout May, the unit is unlocked and empty a day before rent would be due for June. The unit is vacated.

    Approximately 2 weeks after the unit is vacated, we receive a chargeback from the credit card company for March, April and May rent for this customer disputing that "goods and services were not received". We respond within their 3 day time period with the lease signed by the customer (outlining the possession and care of contents section) the signed, chip read receipts for payment and gate access logs.

    The dispute resolution team responds that our response is "insufficient to address the card holders claim that the paid storage services when she went there in May all her belongings were gone and you would not help and services were not received". They now want us to "provide documentation that services were rendered". We have no other documentation outside of what we sent and they can't give us a specific definition of what they want.

    The owner has called the dispute resolution team and they are apparently swinging toward the customer at this time, which surprised me. We let them know that we do not agree that they are correct and they said they would "escalate" the complaint. (I have no idea what that means?)

    I would think this would be a civil matter for the customer and I'm confused as to how the credit card company can essentially disregard a separate legal contract we have with the card holder?




  • #2
    What kind of info did you give the c/c company about making tenant aware of her responsibility for her belongings when it comes to insurance? How can she prove what was in there? All her belongings were not gone, just some according to the tenant.

    Rent or house payments on where she lives is not credited back after a home break in. The break in is handled by insurance, just like she should have had. IMO she is ANOTHER "entitled" person who wants to blame others for her mistakes.

    If you want, offer to not fight the 3 month charge back if she signs away the idea of suing you. If not, let her sue. If you have the lease signed and initialed correctly and you cover your bases at move in, then she can pound sand. All my tenants know and sign off that they are responsible for their insurance needs.

    Last but not least, document every step of every thing that has and will happen.
    "Never let the inmates run the asylum!"

    Comment


    • #3
      I sent them the lease she signed and specified the section dealing with the contents. She did initial the insurance section. The property they store not being covered by us is explained to everyone ad nausem in 3 different places at the lease signing to make things clear.

      I'm sure that she consulted with a lawyer prior to handling it this way and found out it was not going to go her way.

      I was just surprised at the cooperation of the credit card provider response.

      Comment


      • #4
        The c/c company is her c/c company. She is their customer. They will say what they have so far. I would dispute it to the end. It already sounds like she found out she has no legs to stand on for a law suit. The only recourse she was told about is the 3 months rent. You don't need a lawyer to dispute the chargeback, so fight on. Plus, document, document and if I didn't say it yet, document.

        Years ago a lawyer friend of mine told me, "If it isn't documented, it didn't happen".
        "Never let the inmates run the asylum!"

        Comment


        • #5
          By all means go after this person, this kind of stuff erks me to the core!!! principal, principal, principal
          Dave (Woodee) Scott

          Comment


          • #6
            Did you look at the security camera footage?
            You can tell a lot about a tenant from his padlock.

            Comment


            • #7
              She last accessed in January, this came up in May. Our cameras don't retain video that far back. And I don't know when I'd have time to watch all that.

              I was more concerned that the credit card provider is even entertaining issuing these payments back basically disregarding our rental agreement and the precedent this sets for anyone who vacates their unit and decides after they're done that they "didn't get services" and we then have to prove they did.

              I assumed only a judge could interpret a legal contract as lawful or not, not a credit card dispute resolution team.

              Comment

              Latest Topics

              Collapse

              • Merman
                Reply to New Facility - Wish List
                Merman
                Avoid swinging gates if at all possible. We have swings and rolling due to property limitations and the swings have given us trouble. Lighting in units with a timer switch in a common area for customers. For the perimeter fence, I would make the bottom 3 or 4' a solid wall and if you want, a more...
                Yesterday, 09:15 PM
              • eileen
                Reply to Credit Card Chargeback for unit break in?
                eileen
                She last accessed in January, this came up in May. Our cameras don't retain video that far back. And I don't know when I'd have time to watch all that.

                I was more concerned that the credit card provider is even entertaining issuing these payments back basically disregarding our rental agreement...
                Yesterday, 04:13 PM
              • Dave Scott
                Reply to Tasty Treats
                Dave Scott
                Fried green tomatoes and corn on the cob...
                Yesterday, 03:48 PM
              Working...
              X