I would like feedback from people who have used Noke One and PTI Door Boss systems. I could justify the price of the Noke system if I knew it would work every time, but I read that it fails at least occasionally, which would be a big problem for me as a remote manager. I am starting to think the DaVinci system is the way to go, even though placing overlocks would still have to be done manually. It looks like SiteLink works automatically with DaVinci to send unlock codes when delinquent payments are made and new customers rent units. How many overlocks can I expect to place per month on my upcoming facility in western North Carolina? Any one having 100% performance with Noke or PTI?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Electronic locks - Noke vs. PTI vs. DaVinci
Collapse
X
-
I'm a remote owner, using Da Vinci Locks, and so far that system has worked great for me. I go to my facility once a week, and typically I'll have these lock tasks on my list:
1) Remove any returned locks from the dropbox and desginate them as "available"
2) Overlock a late tenant and add that lock code to their unit notes in ESS
3) Walk-through (leaf blower) and re-lock any vacated unit and enter that lock code in the unit notes in ESS
When a new customer rents, or a late tenant pays up, those unlock codes are sent to them automatically. Can't imagine how many trips Da Vinci has saved me.
- Likes 1
-
-
I have about the same routine as RHS_TX. Remote manage, visit each week (less if slow), DaVinci locks, Easy Storage.
Each visit I am doing some of the following:
- Look for move outs that haven't notified us (yeah, about 30% of people just take their lock and leave) - gets the unit rentable faster.
- Trash pickup
- Spray weeds, fill mouse bait
- Pickup office door payment drop-offs
- Delete old gate codes & create new ones if needed
- Overlock units or unlock
- Meet new customers that like to see the unit first and sign in person
I have a few cameras I can monitor gate activity with. If I see a truck leave filled with stuff and no move out in the system then I probably have an empty unit.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
order davinci locks a while back, we actually just started setting them up and did our 1st trial run..... FAILED.... having issues with the payments. 1) problem for us is we have a ton of tenants that just straight up refuse to put a card on file in sitelink (which is necessary with davinci), 2) another problem is placing a card on file in sitelink is all correct, when you go to the davincilockrelease.com, pull up the account, it shows the correct last four digits of the credit card but it changes the expiration date from what is shown in sitelink. Example sitelink shows exp. date as 07/2025 (matches the card) in davincilockrelease.com it shows the last four digits are correct but the exp. date shows 08/2025. It literally bumps the expiration up 1 month, which is causing the payment to be declined. 3) Locks are not cheap but cheaper than the noke etc. 4.) contacted davinci for support and emailed back and forth a few times, blame is being put on sitelink..and problem has not been resolved, so far wasted money on locks that we can't use efficiently.
Comment
-
Originally posted by GM - StacieJ. - BSS View Postorder davinci locks a while back, we actually just started setting them up and did our 1st trial run..... FAILED.... having issues with the payments. 1) problem for us is we have a ton of tenants that just straight up refuse to put a card on file in sitelink (which is necessary with davinci), 2) another problem is placing a card on file in sitelink is all correct, when you go to the davincilockrelease.com, pull up the account, it shows the correct last four digits of the credit card but it changes the expiration date from what is shown in sitelink. Example sitelink shows exp. date as 07/2025 (matches the card) in davincilockrelease.com it shows the last four digits are correct but the exp. date shows 08/2025. It literally bumps the expiration up 1 month, which is causing the payment to be declined. 3) Locks are not cheap but cheaper than the noke etc. 4.) contacted davinci for support and emailed back and forth a few times, blame is being put on sitelink..and problem has not been resolved, so far wasted money on locks that we can't use efficiently.MamaDuke
Comment
-
Originally posted by MamaDuke View Post
We just have the payments processed in Sitelink. It still triggers DaVinci to send the code to the customer to remove the lock.
Comment
-
I don't have payments integrated with Davinci. I just type the lock code into the unit notes with ESS, and when the customer rents and pays they get an auto generated email with their temporary gate code and the davinci unlock code. Works like a charm and no chance for software conflicts between ESS and Davinci
Comment
-
Originally posted by RHS_TX View PostI don't have payments integrated with Davinci. I just type the lock code into the unit notes with ESS, and when the customer rents and pays they get an auto generated email with their temporary gate code and the davinci unlock code. Works like a charm and no chance for software conflicts between ESS and Davinci
Comment
Latest Topics
Collapse
-
by RMRSSNormally what I do if a current autopay tenant is renting an additional space is to complete their rental without taking a payment, then I go through Operations > Payments, select the new unit under "Apply To" at the top left, then select their existing card on the top right under "Cards...
-
Channel: Technology: Software and Security
Today, 05:01 PM -
-
by helenatimDoes this work if a tenant rents a second unit to add that unit to autopay??...
-
Channel: Technology: Software and Security
Today, 04:30 PM -
-
Reply to Backup Sitelink eSign Leasesby helenatimI let the Storable servers save it. Nothing stored here.
-
Channel: Technology: Software and Security
Today, 04:29 PM -
Comment